# Radiocarbon dating machine calibration

The scripts below examines the transition when the declining growth rate exhibits a short reversion (i.e. The plot function requires the definition of an argument, which indicates what needs to be plotted (either the results of the statistical tests or the local estimates of geometric growth rates).The scripts below examines the transition when the declining growth rate exhibits a short reversion (i.e.6500-6000 to 6000-5500 cal BP).Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! One of the most frequent uses of **radiocarbon** **dating** is to estimate the age of organic remains from archaeological sites. Such raw ages can be calibrated to give calendar dates.Timpson et al 2015) or to determine whether the relative proportion of different dated materials changes across time.Collard et al (2010) for instance demonstrates that the relative frequency of different kinds of archaeological site has varied over time in Britain, whilst Stevens and Fuller (2012) argue that the proportion of wild versus domesticated crops fluctuated during the Neolithic (see also Bevan et al. The When geographic study areas are very large, it becomes inappropriate to assume that there is complete spatial homogeneity in the demographic trajectories of different sub-regions in the study area.New case studies from across the globe are regularly being published, stimulating the development of new techniques to tackle specific methodological and interpretative issues.package for the analysis of large collection of **radiocarbon** dates, with particular emphasis on the “date as data” approach pioneered by Rick (1987).

function, which uses the probability density approach (Stuiver and Reimar 1993, Van Der Plicht 1993, Bronk Ramsey 2008) implemented in most **calibration** software (e.g.

Using normalised or non-normalised **calibrations** does not have an impact on the shape of individual calibrated probability distribution, but does influence the shape of SPDs, so we suggest that at minimum a case study should explore whether its results differ much when normalised versus unnormalised dates are used.

SPDs can be potentially biased if there is strong inter-site variability in sample size, for example where one well-resourced research project has sampled one particular site for an unusual number of dates.

The resulting set of **radiocarbon** dates can then be calibrated and aggregated in order to generate an expected SPD of the fitted model that takes into account idiosyncrasies of the **calibration** process.

This process can be repeated times to generate a distribution of SPDs (which takes into account the effect of sampling error) that can be compared to the observed data.