Createuserwizard not validating

posted by | Leave a comment

A typical scenario to overcome the limitation of the Membership API is to develop a new provider that inherits from the Membership Provider where you override the existing methods and add more functionality as the application requires, but in this article I will show you an entirely different approach. Last Lockout Date) As you can see, the Extended Membership User object inherits from the Membership User class.

Before I get to my new approach, here is a brief breakdown, through a simple example, of how the scenario mentioned above works so you can see the difference. NET page gathers all the required information about the member using the Profile object to store the additional data. The constructor’s input is an object of type Membership User and the three added properties mentioned above.

The page calls the static method, Create User, which is part of the Membership class. In this case, the constructor makes a call to the base class inheriting from the Membership User.

In the new membership provider, the Create User method would still function as before by adding the member’s record into the default database; however, it will also be responsible to add the additional member-related data that was saved in the profile object previously, into a new table added to the database that will hold the additional related data on the member’s record. The full constructor shown in the code snippet below has as input a list of all the individual properties of the Membership User together with the custom properties that I added.

In this article, I’ll present one of the available techniques used to extend the Microsoft ASP.

NET 2.0 Membership API to solve some of the limitations of that API. NET 2.0 shipped with a complete membership API that allows developers to manage the application’s users and their roles.

createuserwizard not validating-40createuserwizard not validating-21

Although the Membership API presents a generic member’s record, Microsoft built the Membership API upon the provider model, so, you can easily solve that limitation and extend the current Membership API to serve your needs.In addition, the Membership User class discussed above represents a single member in the Membership API database.The above can be better understood by having a look at the Membership API class hierarchy (Figure 1).For example, the Membership User class, which is found in the Membership API and represents a member saved in the application’s database, contains a limited number of properties.This class does not support the First Name and Last Name properties, for example.

Leave a Reply

Free chat fuck no sighn up